Warning: count(): Parameter must be an array or an object that implements Countable in /kunden/567486_14057/dev.pdfa.org/wp-content/plugins/Ultimate-Premium-Plugin/usm_premium_icons.php on line 520

PDF Association logo.



About the contributor
Duff Johnson

A veteran of the electronic document space, Duff Johnson is an independent consultant, Executive Director of the PDF Association and ISO Project co-Leader (and US TAG chair) for ISO 32000 and ISO 14289.
More contributions
Participating in the PDF Techniques Accessibility Summit

The PDF Techniques Accessibility Summit’s objective is to establish a broad-based understanding of how PDF files should be tagged for accessibilty. It’s an opportunity to focus on establishing a common set of examples of accessible PDF content, and identify best-practice when tagging difficult cases.

Modernizing PDF Techniques for Accessibility

The PDF Techniques Accessibility Summit will identify best-practices in tagging various cases in PDF documents. Questions to be addressed will likely include: the legal ways to tag a nested list, the correct way to caption multiple images, the appropriate way to organize content within headings.

Refried PDF

My hospital emailed me a medical records release form as a PDF. They told me to print it, fill it, sign it, scan it and return it to the medical records department, in that order. In 2018? To get the form via email (i.e., electronically), yet be asked to print it? Did the last 20 years just… not mean anything! So I thought I’d be clever. I’d fill it first, THEN print it. Or better yet, never print it, but sign it anyhow, and return it along with a note making the case for improving their workflow. The story continues…

Slides and video recordings of PDF Days Europe 2018

You missed the PDF Days Europe 2018? Never mind! Here you can find the slides and video recordings of all 32 stunning sessions!

PDF Association expands its board of directors

Catherine Andersz of PDFTron Systems, Alaine Behler of iText Software and Peter Wyatt, ISO Project Leader for ISO 32000 enrich the newly elected board of the PDF Association.

Using PDF/UA in accessibility checklists

A montage of accessibility checklists.Organizations tasked with ensuring their electronic content is accessible aren’t really interested in the technical details. They need straightforward solutions, usable workflows, reliable results and accountable systems.

Throughout the US federal government the accessibility requirement these agencies must meet is Section 508, which itself identifies WCAG 2.0 Level AA as its standard, among other requirements.

Many other governments worldwide also use WCAG 2.0, and increasingly, it’s being adopted in commercial settings engaged in improving their accessibility to disabled populations.

As an operational matter, the process of assuring that content is accessible involves substantial training, adequate software and sufficient staff-time. Anything that helps streamline this process, reduces costs, or facilitates accessibility upgrades or validation in more content, is of interest.

PDF’s place in document technology

PDF remains indispensable. A recent analysis presented at PDF Days Europe 2018 concluded that 1 in 20 static web pages was a PDF file. But the web holds just a small fraction of documents. Trillions of PDF files exist in private collections as the embodiment of documentation, contracts, invoices, statements, policies, records, terms, maps, academic papers and so many more applications.

PDF and accessibility testing

Due to PDF’s inherent flexibility, the testing required to account for the potential variety of content in PDF files can be substantial. PDF/UA, the ISO specification for accessible PDF, packages these requirements together and includes (according to the Matterhorn Protocol) 136 distinct tests for accessible PDF files.

This might seem daunting. Which is unfortunate, because it should be liberating.

PDF/UA and accessibility testing

Of the 136 tests described in the Matterhorn Protocol, 87 may be fully automated with software. Human intervention is only required to assess and correct any errors located by software.

The 47 checks that may require human judgement boil down to:

  • Confirming that the document’s semantics as indicated by the tags are accurate
  • Confirming that the order of semantic content is logical
  • Confirming that any role-mappings in use are valid
  • Several checks that apply equally to other forms of content (color, contrast, metadata, alternate text for images, language)
  • Checks pertaining to JavaScript, or other content-specific checks

All of these tests may be performed very efficiently by software designed for PDF/UA validation. For example. it’s possible to perform most of these tests via a quick review of pages and tags.

Applying PDF/UA to accessibility-validation processes allows one to package sets of tests together, streamlining the validation process.

Use PDF/UA to simplify the process

If agencies can learn to use the PDF/UA indicator, accessibility checklists can get a lot easier. Authors and vendors could leverage PDF/UA as part of a declaration of conformance ( VPAT in Section 508 jargon)  for each document. Deliverables specifications might then be summarized as:

  • PDF/UA conformance (as certified by the vendor or provider, and spot-tested by the procuring agency).
  • Policy requirements (i.e., the gap between PDF/UA and the standard you need to meet). Such requirements might include (as examples):
    • application of specific WCAG 2.0 Success Criteria that are desirable in addition to qualities covered by PDF/UA
    • restrictions in terms of fonts or font-sizes used
    • generalized requirements for the use of simple tables
    • any other specific policy

This approach would set clear, consumable expectations and reduce testing complexity to help drive achievement of organizational accessibility objectives.

Categories: PDF/UA, Perspective, Standards adoption